Solar + storage installations are expected to grow 50x between now and 2018, totalling $1B in value, and then rising to $8B by 2026 (Source: GTM). Drivers include falling solar costs, falling energy storage costs, corporate go-to-market partnerships, utility interest in quicker and cheaper grid improvements, and more favorable government policies.
Solar developers and energy storage providers will benefit from strategic partnerships to streamline systems integration and double customer and site acquisition efforts. What energy storage technology will solar leaders bet on? Despite what the headlines suggest, lithium-ion is not the only game in town, and batteries are not interchangeable commodities like solar panels have become.
Investors should spend more time now getting smart on how to underwrite energy storage projects. Pipelines to facilitate significant capital placement are currently limited, but that will change in the near term. How will banking partners underwrite non-contracted revenues? What debt service coverage ratios and loan-to-cost ratios will they accept? What third-party evidence will support future host demand charge reduction payments? How long will batteries last, and how will price reductions influence future storage upgrades?
Solar + storage development partners include big names. Consider Sonnen + Sungevity, Stem + SunPower, Solarcity + Tesla, and Green Charge Networks + SunEdison. Who’s next?
Hype vs. reality
Countless headlines talk about 2015, and now 2016, as the year of energy storage. However, most project economics are challenging outside of California, Hawaii, and the PJM territory. Investors and developers need patience and an ability to say “no” now in order to benefit from the significant opportunities in solar + storage estimated for 2018 and beyond.
The global pipeline of planned energy storage projects is over 1.5 GW. About 50% are expected in the U.S., while Japan may see about 20%. (Source: IHS)
Solar panel and project costs have fallen 70% since 2006 (Source: SEIA). And now it’s time for the energy storage industry to do the same: Battery costs have fallen 50% since 2010, and are expected to fall another 40% (flow batteries) to 60% (lithium-ion) by 2020 (Source: Moody’s, AECOM).
Stacking sources of revenue
Making the economics pencil for solar + storage projects will be easier for installations that tap into more than 1 of the 12 behind-the-meter and in-front-of-the-meter benefits that batteries can provide (Source: RMI, Lazard).
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) recently allocated $18 million to innovative efforts at universities, national labs, and utilities to reduce the cost of solar + storage projects to 14 cents per kilowatt-hour. In a similar DOE initiative, the SunShot program, efforts have been successful thus far to reduce solar costs to 6 cents per kilowatt-hour by 2020. Might these new grant programs help stimulate the market to achieve parallel cost reductions in the energy storage market?
Article via IronOak Energy Insights