Code Green Solutions
Last week was time for the 2016 installment of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Better Building Summit. As in prior years, the Summit was full of friends and leaders from across the real estate industry.
I had the opportunity to participate in a session moderated by Dr. Jason Hartke (DOE), David deVos (Prudential Real Estate Investors) and Jennifer McConkey (Principal Real Estate Investors). I want to reflect on one question we received during our session. A member of the audience asked about industry expectations for future energy cost saving potential – 10, 20, 50%? This is a reasonable question, but the tone and implication of the question seemed to suggest that operational energy cost savings was the principal or primary motivation for incorporating sustainability into real estate.
In the spirit of the Summit’s focus on “Better Buildings”, I think it is important to put this question into a broader context. Opportunities to create value and manage risk go far beyond marginal reductions in utility costs. In fact, leading property companies and funds actively deploy sustainability strategies across the real estate life cycle, including:
The GRESB Real Estate Assessment recognizes companies and funds that use this kind of thinking to integrate sustainability into their business – taking deliberate action at each stage to manage risk and create competitive advantage. “Integration” sounds like a buzzword. Put more simply, an integrated business strategy makes these companies better by creating the potential for them to make more money with less risk than their conventional counterparts. For companies with integrated sustainability strategies, the return on sustainability is measured far beyond utility cost savings.